University teacher training |
Written by Carles Monereo |
Friday, 03 August 2012 00:00 |
Call for papers closed
Manuscript submission deadline: December 31st, 2012.
Traditionally, universities have been an amplifier of social, scientific, cultural, political, and economic conflicts. Although always slowly –we cannot forget that the mission of universities is to conserve the so-called scientific knowledge and to avoid unsubstantiated fashions and fads– the universities have managed to adapt many situations and contexts, meeting the demands of each time. However, universities have rarely been faced to times as turbulent as the current ones, characterized by a deep global crisis of the academic model (incursion of ICT, based-on-competencies curriculum, mobility needs, accountability, etc.), of the economic model (global deficit, bankrupt states, failure in economic markets, etc.), as well as of the socio-political model (student protest movements, the emergence of radical ideologies, etc.). In the context of this maelstrom, it seems surprising that university teachers (e.g., professors, lecturers, teaching fellows) are still in many cases former students, with little or no training preparation. University teachers often move from learning in the classroom, as students, to teaching others, as educators. Their teaching commonly draws on their own mostly implicit conceptions about the meaning and sense that learning and teaching their own subject matter have. Call for papers closed Traditionally, universities have been an amplifier of social, scientific, cultural, political, and economic conflicts. Although always slowly –we cannot forget that the mission of universities is to conserve the so-called scientific knowledge and to avoid unsubstantiated fashions and fads– the universities have managed to adapt many situations and contexts, meeting the demands of each time. However, universities have rarely been faced to times as turbulent as the current ones, characterized by a deep global crisis of the academic model (incursion of ICT, based-on-competencies curriculum, mobility needs, accountability, etc.), of the economic model (global deficit, bankrupt states, failure in economic markets, etc.), as well as of the socio-political model (student protest movements, the emergence of radical ideologies, etc.). In the context of this maelstrom, it seems surprising that university teachers (e.g., professors, lecturers, teaching fellows) are still in many cases former students, with little or no training preparation. University teachers often move from learning in the classroom, as students, to teaching others, as educators. Their teaching commonly draws on their own mostly implicit conceptions about the meaning and sense that learning and teaching their own subject matter have. Fortunately, there is an increasing awareness of the importance of helping prospective teachers develop their teaching competencies, as well as a growing recognition of the role of university teachers (although the recognition of the teaching role is much lower than that of the researcher role). Interest in establishing fairer evaluation systems has also increased. Seniority is no longer considered the only evaluation criterion. Different mechanisms to help university teachers improve their teaching competencies have been adopted by many universities: hosting plans for beginners, courses and seminars (mandatory and optional), self-analysis of own teaching practice, portfolios and professional journals, communities of learning, workshops intended to exchange good practices, micro-teaching, problem-based learning, and so forth. Such mechanisms have been implemented in a diversity of ways: conferences and sporadic lectures, continuing education seminars, specific master and doctoral programs. This variety of initiatives, though, has rarely been examined under rigorous research conditions aimed at describing, explaining, comparing, and/or optimizing the proposed training systems, procedures, and experiences. Infancia y Aprendizaje's Editors consider that this is the perfect time to focus on original research addressing the topic of university teachers' teaching training.
• University teachers' professional identity, narrative identity, self-biographical identity, identity/ies in-action. Identity as a learner and as a teacher. We are less interested in manuscripts focused on: a) Excessively local approaches; b) Theoretical issues, with no data that support the proposed innovations and/or claims; c) Management and administrative issues, or based on institutionalized accreditation systems. Manuscripts are to be submitted in Spanish or English. Editor: Dr. Carles Monereo. Co-Editor of Infancia y Aprendizaje. Manuscript submission deadline: December 31st, 2012. Publication date: September 2013 (volume 36/3)
The complete manuscript should not exceed 7,000 words or 44,000 characters. Submission will be made exclusively online through the RECYT online platform (manuscripts cannot be submitted by postal mail). Please visit our electronic address: http://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/IyA/login |